open-discussion > PANDA netork matrix AND Grenta analysis
Showing 1-1 of 1 posts
Feb 3, 2015 05:02 AM | hubm cubm
PANDA netork matrix AND Grenta analysis
Hi, Cui,
I used PANDA to perform deterministic network analysis and obtained the FN-weighted matrix. Then, I used Grenta Software to calculate topological index (threshold FN=1~5). But the results are strange; they are very different from that in the published papers. For example, Cp should be 0~1.0, but in my results, it is 0.01~0.1. Could you help me to find the reason?
Cp: 3.3955610200078326e-002 4.2559377959178711e-002 4.6620267564943377e-002 4.8218381264905484e-002 5.0565191245506041e-002
Lp: 6.9198491803862325e-002 6.9198491803862325e-002 6.9198491803862325e-002 6.9198491803862325e-002 6.9198491803862325e-002
Gamma: 5.5468367647742234e+000 6.3253877462728818e+000 6.7101733595762036e+000 6.8437082629518491e+000 6.5945134077253487e+000
Lamda: 1.4930984533701861e+000 1.4906143686574922e+000 1.4927741292155021e+000 1.4929528155462275e+000 1.4952665136403214e+000
Sigma: 3.7149839330782481e+000 4.2434769711563849e+000 4.4951029283329031e+000 4.5840084105055512e+000 4.4102595407360434e+000
gE: 1.8115649113285638e+001 1.8115649113285638e+001 1.8115649113285638e+001 1.8115649113285638e+001 1.8115649113285638e+001
LocE: 3.7282666742083904e+001 3.7001485712715059e+001 3.8769746886469257e+001 3.8826655738023682e+001 3.9865797234883523e+001
Thanks!
By the way, I try to invert X, Y, Z to find whether fiber tracking is right. But it did not change my result very much.
I used PANDA to perform deterministic network analysis and obtained the FN-weighted matrix. Then, I used Grenta Software to calculate topological index (threshold FN=1~5). But the results are strange; they are very different from that in the published papers. For example, Cp should be 0~1.0, but in my results, it is 0.01~0.1. Could you help me to find the reason?
Cp: 3.3955610200078326e-002 4.2559377959178711e-002 4.6620267564943377e-002 4.8218381264905484e-002 5.0565191245506041e-002
Lp: 6.9198491803862325e-002 6.9198491803862325e-002 6.9198491803862325e-002 6.9198491803862325e-002 6.9198491803862325e-002
Gamma: 5.5468367647742234e+000 6.3253877462728818e+000 6.7101733595762036e+000 6.8437082629518491e+000 6.5945134077253487e+000
Lamda: 1.4930984533701861e+000 1.4906143686574922e+000 1.4927741292155021e+000 1.4929528155462275e+000 1.4952665136403214e+000
Sigma: 3.7149839330782481e+000 4.2434769711563849e+000 4.4951029283329031e+000 4.5840084105055512e+000 4.4102595407360434e+000
gE: 1.8115649113285638e+001 1.8115649113285638e+001 1.8115649113285638e+001 1.8115649113285638e+001 1.8115649113285638e+001
LocE: 3.7282666742083904e+001 3.7001485712715059e+001 3.8769746886469257e+001 3.8826655738023682e+001 3.9865797234883523e+001
Thanks!
By the way, I try to invert X, Y, Z to find whether fiber tracking is right. But it did not change my result very much.
