help > RE: Second level results?
Apr 9, 2015  12:04 PM | Alfonso Nieto-Castanon - Boston University
RE: Second level results?
Hi Kaitlin,
 
Both methods are perfectly valid. Typically cluster-extent inferences may be more sensitive to detect relatively weak but large clusters of 'activation', while peak-based inferences amay be more sensitive to detect small but strong clusters of 'activation'. These differences are unrelated to whether your design is longitudinal or cross-sectional so, as far as I can tell, there is no good reason to prefer one method over the other a priori in your analysis (you should nevertheless not choose a posteriori based on which method gives you better results; i.e. simply use a consistent criteria across your potentially-multiple analyses unless you have a good a priori reason to use different thresholds or different methods across your multiple analyses).
 
Hope this helps
Alfonso
Originally posted by Kaitlin Cassady:
Hi there!

Just wanted to follow up on this post, since I haven't received a response to my question yet. Any suggestions/insight would be greatly appreciated!

Thank you!

Threaded View

TitleAuthorDate
Johnson H Oct 18, 2011
Alfonso Nieto-Castanon Oct 18, 2011
Kaitlin Cassady Feb 25, 2015
Kaitlin Cassady Apr 8, 2015
RE: Second level results?
Alfonso Nieto-Castanon Apr 9, 2015
Sheeba Arnold Feb 21, 2012
Alfonso Nieto-Castanon Feb 23, 2012
Johnson H Oct 19, 2011
Mary Newsome Dec 14, 2011