help
help > RE: Second level random effects analysis
Jun 8, 2015 07:06 PM | Kaitlin Cassady - University of Michigan - Ann Arbor
RE: Second level random effects analysis
Hi Alfonso,
Thanks for the very helpful response. Just to clarify, In terms of the equation: 2*spm_invTcdf(.95,N-1)*std(x)/sqrt(N), which computes the CIs, does this compute 90% or 95% CIs? Also, when I input these CI values into a plot to produce error bars, the error bars appeared much larger than those that were produced with the CONN toolbox. Do I need to first divide these values by 2 if I want to display the error bars on both sides (both positive and negative) of the average contrast estimates?
Thanks!
Thanks for the very helpful response. Just to clarify, In terms of the equation: 2*spm_invTcdf(.95,N-1)*std(x)/sqrt(N), which computes the CIs, does this compute 90% or 95% CIs? Also, when I input these CI values into a plot to produce error bars, the error bars appeared much larger than those that were produced with the CONN toolbox. Do I need to first divide these values by 2 if I want to display the error bars on both sides (both positive and negative) of the average contrast estimates?
Thanks!
Threaded View
| Title | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Kaitlin Cassady | May 30, 2015 | |
| Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | May 30, 2015 | |
| Kaitlin Cassady | Jun 4, 2015 | |
| Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Jun 4, 2015 | |
| Kaitlin Cassady | Jun 5, 2015 | |
| Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Jun 8, 2015 | |
| Kevin Mann | Jun 16, 2016 | |
| Kaitlin Cassady | Jun 8, 2015 | |
| Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Jun 9, 2015 | |
| Kaitlin Cassady | Jun 9, 2015 | |
