help > RE: ICA: Parameter Choice and 2nd Level Effects ?
Oct 12, 2016  07:10 PM | Shady El Damaty - Georgetown University
RE: ICA: Parameter Choice and 2nd Level Effects ?
Wow! great response Alfonso --

There are all sorts of issues I ran into trying to implement this on my own (memory issues nonwithstanding) so I have been using existing implementations. I've managed to estimate MDL for each individual subject's denoised data using the icatb_estimate_dimension.m function in the GIFT toolbox.  However I'm not too confident in the results since the MDL estimate hasn't been performed using the group level data but rather individual subjects (which all turned out to be 56...).  I've attached a plot of the MDL/AIC estimate with shaded error bars across subjects.  Does this look right to you?

Thank you so much for your continued support!!

Threaded View

TitleAuthorDate
Shady El Damaty Sep 18, 2016
Alfonso Nieto-Castanon Sep 29, 2016
David Pagliaccio Jan 10, 2018
Julia Binnewies Oct 12, 2016
Julia Binnewies Oct 18, 2016
Shady El Damaty Oct 18, 2016
Jeff Browndyke Oct 18, 2016
Shady El Damaty Oct 18, 2016
RE: ICA: Parameter Choice and 2nd Level Effects ?
Shady El Damaty Oct 12, 2016
Alfonso Nieto-Castanon Oct 14, 2016
Shady El Damaty Oct 16, 2016
Alfonso Nieto-Castanon Oct 17, 2016
Shady El Damaty Oct 17, 2016
Shady El Damaty Oct 21, 2016
Alfonso Nieto-Castanon Oct 25, 2016
Jeff Browndyke Oct 19, 2016
Alfonso Nieto-Castanon Oct 20, 2016
Jeff Browndyke Oct 20, 2016
Shady El Damaty Sep 28, 2016