help
help > RE: MVPA explained variance
Jul 23, 2018 06:07 PM | Yun Wang - Columbia University
RE: MVPA explained variance
Hi Alfonso,
I want to get an effect size map (partial eta-square map) from MVPA analysis instead of showing F maps.
I choose the first 5 components and have 64 subjects.
Does it make sense to calculate the eta-square map simply as : F/(F+62-5) ?
Thank you very much!
Yun
I want to get an effect size map (partial eta-square map) from MVPA analysis instead of showing F maps.
I choose the first 5 components and have 64 subjects.
Does it make sense to calculate the eta-square map simply as : F/(F+62-5) ?
Thank you very much!
Yun
Threaded View
| Title | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Roger Mateu | Jun 10, 2016 | |
| Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Jun 13, 2016 | |
| Roger Mateu | Jun 13, 2016 | |
| Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Jun 15, 2016 | |
| Yun Wang | Jul 23, 2018 | |
| Yun Wang | Dec 4, 2017 | |
| Roger Mateu | Jun 21, 2016 | |