help
help > RE: Problem representing pial surfaces and aseg ROIS from FreeSurfer
Nov 9, 2018 09:11 AM | Alexis Moscoso
RE: Problem representing pial surfaces and aseg ROIS from FreeSurfer
That was the problem. For some reason, Freesurfer VOIs were not
centered where they should. After recentering and use Old Normalise
from SPM to align with ch2 template I could use the smoothed_ch2
surface to cover my VOIs. Thanks for your help!
Originally posted by Mingrui Xia:
Originally posted by Mingrui Xia:
Dear Alexis,
I've checked your files. The X, Y, Z ranges for lh.pial and rh.pial are [-68.6418, 1.7941], [-94.3788, 55.5636], [-58.9766, 64.7290] and [-5.0226, 67.0435], [-95.0301, 53.5139], [-56.5119, 65.2336], respectively. This was loaded by the function read_surf.m provided by FreeSurfer. The XYZ space loaded by spm_vol.m and spm_read_vols.m in SPM are [83.0915, 338.0915], [137.6303, 392.6303], [425.8168, 680.8168]. That's why they mismatched. I suggest to check if the VOI file shares space information with other anatomical images (e.g., original T1?).
Best,
Mingrui
Originally posted by Alexis Moscoso:
I've checked your files. The X, Y, Z ranges for lh.pial and rh.pial are [-68.6418, 1.7941], [-94.3788, 55.5636], [-58.9766, 64.7290] and [-5.0226, 67.0435], [-95.0301, 53.5139], [-56.5119, 65.2336], respectively. This was loaded by the function read_surf.m provided by FreeSurfer. The XYZ space loaded by spm_vol.m and spm_read_vols.m in SPM are [83.0915, 338.0915], [137.6303, 392.6303], [425.8168, 680.8168]. That's why they mismatched. I suggest to check if the VOI file shares space information with other anatomical images (e.g., original T1?).
Best,
Mingrui
Originally posted by Alexis Moscoso:
Originally posted by Mingrui Xia:
Thanks for your quick reply. Attached are both pial surfaces (lh.pial and rh.pial) as provided by FreeSurfer, the merged surface (merged.nv) with the BrainNet tool, and the aparc+aseg.nii VOI map, obtained with FreeSurfer after converting it to .nii with FreeSurfer's mri_convert. I also attached a picture of the result of plotting a couple of VOIs and the surface. As can be seen, they are not aligned at all.
According to FreeSurfer documentation, pial surfaces and VOI maps are in the same space, .i.e., the so-called "Anatomical Space" of FreeSurfer. Thus, the problem might be the way that BrainNet handles the .pial files...
Dear Alexis,
Could you please upload your files that I can have a check? I guess the surface and the volume are not in a same space.
Could you please upload your files that I can have a check? I guess the surface and the volume are not in a same space.
Thanks for your quick reply. Attached are both pial surfaces (lh.pial and rh.pial) as provided by FreeSurfer, the merged surface (merged.nv) with the BrainNet tool, and the aparc+aseg.nii VOI map, obtained with FreeSurfer after converting it to .nii with FreeSurfer's mri_convert. I also attached a picture of the result of plotting a couple of VOIs and the surface. As can be seen, they are not aligned at all.
According to FreeSurfer documentation, pial surfaces and VOI maps are in the same space, .i.e., the so-called "Anatomical Space" of FreeSurfer. Thus, the problem might be the way that BrainNet handles the .pial files...
Threaded View
Title | Author | Date |
---|---|---|
Alexis Moscoso | Oct 31, 2018 | |
Mingrui Xia | Nov 1, 2018 | |
Alexis Moscoso | Nov 2, 2018 | |
Mingrui Xia | Nov 4, 2018 | |
Alexis Moscoso | Nov 9, 2018 | |