help > RE: Questions about ANOVA models
Feb 18, 2015  04:02 PM | Alfonso Nieto-Castanon - Boston University
RE: Questions about ANOVA models
Hi Yong,

Sorry about this, the original contrast that I listed in my previous response for the OR-conjunction analyses was not correct, please use instead:

 OR conjunction of simple main group effects (differences between patients and control during either pre- or post-medication)
 Select "Patients-Pre" "Patients-Post" "Controls" "Subject1" "Subject2" ... "Subject10" and enter contrast [-1 0 1 -ones(1,10)/10; 0 -1 1 -ones(1,10)/10]

(I added an edit with this clarification to the original post response). If using each row of these contrasts separately, the results of those analyses should be similar to the simpler "Patients-pre' "Controls" (contrast -1 1) and "Patients-post" "Controls" (contrast -1 1) analyses, respectively (the only difference being in how the residuals of each analysis are being computed, which affects the statistics but not the effect sizes of your results; in the former case the residual variance is pooled across both patients-pre and patients-post samples, while in the latter analyses the residual variance is computed separately for the patients-pre or patients-post samples)

Hope this clarifies
Alfonso
Originally posted by Yong Li:
Hi Alfonso,

I owe you a long overdue debt of gratitude. Your explanations are really helpful. Thank you!

Furthermore, I would like to better understand the 'conjunction of simple main group effects'. Is it possible to test 'differences between patients and control during pre- and post-medication respectively' with one manova design? Some preference to manova design is evident in RSfMRI literature. Does it make any sense to perform tests, e.g., 1. differences between patients and control during pre-medication by selecting "Patients-Pre" "Patients-Post" "Controls" "Subject1" "Subject2" ... "Subject10" and enter contrast [-1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0]; 2. differences between patients and control during post-medication by selecting "Patients-Pre" "Patients-Post" "Controls" "Subject1" "Subject2" ... "Subject10" and enter contrast [0 -1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0]? If yes, what advantages and disadvantages of this design? After an attempt, I found different results between the aforementioned test 1&2 and those simple group effects by [1 -1].

I hope that I make myself clear. Thank you very much in advance as always.

Best regards,

Yong



Originally posted by Alfonso Nieto-Castanon:
...
Simple main group effects (e.g. comparing the patients and control groups connectivity measures after medication)
   Select "Patients-Post" and "Controls" and enter contrast [1 -1]

Simple main group effects (e.g. comparing the patients and control groups connectivity measures before medication)
   Select "Patients-Pre" and "Controls" and enter contrast [1 -1]

OR conjunction of simple main group effects (differences between patients and control during either pre- or post-medication)
   Select "Patients-Pre" "Patients-Post" "Controls" "Subject1" "Subject2" ... "Subject10" and enter contrast [-1 0 1    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;  0 -1 1   0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0]

Note that the first test above (simple main medication effects) will be effectively equivalent to a paired t-test comparing pre- and post-medication connectivity measures, the next two tests will each be effectively equivalent to a two-sample t-test comparing patients vs. controls connectivity measures, and the last test will be equivalent to a manova of the between-group differences pre- and post- medication.
...

Threaded View

TitleAuthorDate
Yong Li Sep 15, 2014
Alfonso Nieto-Castanon Sep 17, 2014
Yong Li Feb 13, 2015
RE: Questions about ANOVA models
Alfonso Nieto-Castanon Feb 18, 2015
Yong Li Feb 24, 2015
Jeff Browndyke Oct 1, 2014
Alfonso Nieto-Castanon Oct 1, 2014
Traute Demirakca Oct 2, 2014
Jeff Browndyke Oct 1, 2014