help
help > RE: don't need "dmn" or "atlas" as ROIs
May 30, 2015 05:05 AM | Alfonso Nieto-Castanon - Boston University
RE: don't need "dmn" or "atlas" as ROIs
Hi Hengshuang,
That is perfectly fine, you may simply disregard those; i.e. don't select them as seeds, and if performing ROI-to-ROI analyses you may also want to deselect those to avoid them counting in your multiple comparison corrections (e.g. by clicking on the 'select target ROIs' pull-down menu and manually selecting the ROIs that you do want to be included there)
Hope this helps
Alfonso
Originally posted by Hengshuang LIU:
That is perfectly fine, you may simply disregard those; i.e. don't select them as seeds, and if performing ROI-to-ROI analyses you may also want to deselect those to avoid them counting in your multiple comparison corrections (e.g. by clicking on the 'select target ROIs' pull-down menu and manually selecting the ROIs that you do want to be included there)
Hope this helps
Alfonso
Originally posted by Hengshuang LIU:
Hi experts,
I didn't notice "dmn" and "atlas" was set as default ROIs in CONN15 (which I might not need) until finish running first-level analysis. In this case, do I have to remove them in "setup" and rerun everything from "setup" onward (or from first-level picking sources onward)? Or, I just don't select them in second-level contrast defining without the need to rerun the previous steps? Much appreciated for your kind response!
I didn't notice "dmn" and "atlas" was set as default ROIs in CONN15 (which I might not need) until finish running first-level analysis. In this case, do I have to remove them in "setup" and rerun everything from "setup" onward (or from first-level picking sources onward)? Or, I just don't select them in second-level contrast defining without the need to rerun the previous steps? Much appreciated for your kind response!
Threaded View
| Title | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Hengshuang LIU | May 29, 2015 | |
| Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | May 30, 2015 | |
| Hengshuang LIU | May 30, 2015 | |