help
help > RE: Error using conn_process (line 554)
Oct 8, 2015 01:10 PM | Alfonso Nieto-Castanon - Boston University
RE: Error using conn_process (line 554)
Hi Kasey,
I would suggest to try with the latest release of CONN and SPM12 and the standard CONN preprocessing pipeline. If the problem persists it indicates that the normalization/segmentation step could not find a good match between your structural volume tissue maps and their associated templates. This could be because some image issues in the original structural volume or because the original structural volumes are not "close enough" to standard orientation for SPM to find their proper orientation (if that is the case, typically manually rotating your structural volumes to better match the standard orientation solves this issue).
Hope this helps
Alfonso
Originally posted by Kasey Hemington:
I would suggest to try with the latest release of CONN and SPM12 and the standard CONN preprocessing pipeline. If the problem persists it indicates that the normalization/segmentation step could not find a good match between your structural volume tissue maps and their associated templates. This could be because some image issues in the original structural volume or because the original structural volumes are not "close enough" to standard orientation for SPM to find their proper orientation (if that is the case, typically manually rotating your structural volumes to better match the standard orientation solves this issue).
Hope this helps
Alfonso
Originally posted by Kasey Hemington:
Hi Conn experts,
Maxi, I am having a similar error
Error using ==> conn_process at 595
No suprathreshold voxels in ROI file
for some subjects. Has anyone had any luck with this issue since? An older post in 2014 (Use SPM8 new segment instead of normal seg?) suggested that a similar issue/error due to poor segmentation which should have been solved with updated versions.
Thanks,
Kasey
Maxi, I am having a similar error
Error using ==> conn_process at 595
No suprathreshold voxels in ROI file
for some subjects. Has anyone had any luck with this issue since? An older post in 2014 (Use SPM8 new segment instead of normal seg?) suggested that a similar issue/error due to poor segmentation which should have been solved with updated versions.
Thanks,
Kasey
Threaded View
| Title | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Maxi Becker Becker | Jan 5, 2015 | |
| Kasey Hemington | Oct 2, 2015 | |
| Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Oct 8, 2015 | |
| Jeremy Hogeveen | Mar 6, 2017 | |
| Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Mar 7, 2017 | |
| Jeremy Hogeveen | Mar 7, 2017 | |