Hi Alonso!

I was just wondering about the Eklund, Nichols & Knutsson (2016) article that suggests that the cluster level of inference in SPM doesn't protect against false positives, and suggests that results at the voxel-level are accurate, although conservative. The authors suggested a solution of a non-parametric permutation method, which is accurate regarding false positives and not overly conservative. I don't know about the technical feasibility of this, but I wondered if there could be some way to incorporate the SnPM toolbox with Conn. Another approach may be to only refer to the voxel-level results (and not cluster-level), but that may be too conservative.

Thanks very much for your thoughts, as always!
Mary