help
help > RE: T value interpretation in 2nd level analysis
Sep 1, 2016 06:09 PM | Magno Guillen
RE: T value interpretation in 2nd level analysis
Hi Alfonso
Thanks for your reply. Kind of put me in the right track. However, although I am using second level analysis and i am regressing the finding with the lateralization index, I am using just Lateralization index in Subject Effects, one condition (rest), Between subject Contrast [1] and between condition contrast[ 1](see attached image). Thanks to your reply I think I understand the the T value gives me the strength to reject the hypothesis of having no relationship between the connectivity of the analyzed ROI and the given lat index.
Thanks a lot and best regards
Magno
Thanks for your reply. Kind of put me in the right track. However, although I am using second level analysis and i am regressing the finding with the lateralization index, I am using just Lateralization index in Subject Effects, one condition (rest), Between subject Contrast [1] and between condition contrast[ 1](see attached image). Thanks to your reply I think I understand the the T value gives me the strength to reject the hypothesis of having no relationship between the connectivity of the analyzed ROI and the given lat index.
Thanks a lot and best regards
Magno
Threaded View
| Title | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Magno Guillen | Aug 24, 2016 | |
| Magno Guillen | Aug 29, 2016 | |
| Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Aug 30, 2016 | |
| Magno Guillen | Sep 1, 2016 | |
| Magno Guillen | Sep 1, 2016 | |
