processing-scripts
processing-scripts > RE: Nuisance signal regression and resting epochs
Jun 14, 2010 03:06 AM | Xi-Nian Zuo
RE: Nuisance signal regression and resting epochs
Hey Lisa,
Regarding to the first question, my answer would be 'yes', it should work for the usage of 3dREMLfit or 3dDeconvolve. Actually, I tested for using the latter.
For the second question, the logic of regressing out task-related regressors should be the same for both AFNI and FSL. Please refer to the papers of investigating a similar question (Fair et al., 2008: A method for using blocked and event-related fMRI data to study "resting state" functional connectivity).
Best,
Xi-Nian
Regarding to the first question, my answer would be 'yes', it should work for the usage of 3dREMLfit or 3dDeconvolve. Actually, I tested for using the latter.
For the second question, the logic of regressing out task-related regressors should be the same for both AFNI and FSL. Please refer to the papers of investigating a similar question (Fair et al., 2008: A method for using blocked and event-related fMRI data to study "resting state" functional connectivity).
Best,
Xi-Nian
Threaded View
| Title | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Lisa Eyler | Jun 8, 2010 | |
| cirong liu | Nov 1, 2011 | |
| Maarten Mennes | Nov 1, 2011 | |
| Xi-Nian Zuo | Jun 14, 2010 | |
| Maarten Mennes | Jun 14, 2010 | |
| Lisa Eyler | Jun 14, 2010 | |
| veena nair | Aug 4, 2012 | |
| veena nair | Aug 8, 2012 | |
| Maarten Mennes | Aug 8, 2012 | |
| veena nair | Aug 8, 2012 | |
| Zarrar Shehzad | Aug 9, 2011 | |
| Clare Kelly | Jun 16, 2010 | |