processing-scripts > RE: Nuisance signal regression and resting ep
Jun 16, 2010  08:06 AM | Clare Kelly
RE: Nuisance signal regression and resting ep
Hi Lisa,

Sorry for our delay in replying - we're all out of the lab at the moment after OHBM. I will return next week and will be able to deal with your question in more detail then.
I am not surprised that there are some differences between the results produced by the two programs but I can't say for sure what exactly the source of the differences is until I have a look at some data myself. Your commands look reasonable to me.
You're right about using polort 0 as linear and quadratic trends are removed during preprocessing.
Rather than looking at the residuals, I would have a look at some correlation maps generated using the two different residuals files - are these notably different?

I will try to get back to you as soon as I can!

Clare

Threaded View

TitleAuthorDate
Lisa Eyler Jun 8, 2010
cirong liu Nov 1, 2011
Maarten Mennes Nov 1, 2011
Xi-Nian Zuo Jun 14, 2010
Maarten Mennes Jun 14, 2010
Lisa Eyler Jun 14, 2010
veena nair Aug 4, 2012
veena nair Aug 8, 2012
Maarten Mennes Aug 8, 2012
veena nair Aug 8, 2012
Zarrar Shehzad Aug 9, 2011
RE: Nuisance signal regression and resting ep
Clare Kelly Jun 16, 2010