processing-scripts
processing-scripts > RE: Nuisance signal regression and resting ep
Aug 9, 2011 04:08 AM | Zarrar Shehzad
RE: Nuisance signal regression and resting ep
I just saw
this post while google searching something different...and thought
I might chime in.
The minVal thing just specifies a threshold for the smallest positive value in the image. I don't think it should be cause for any difference between FSL and AFNI based scripts. The current FSL (film_gls) command used employs a -noest option wherein autocorrelations are not estimated so you might want to use the -Oerrts output option instead of -Rerrts. I don't know enough to explain why this was done with the FSL command. Also not sure about setting -polort 0.
Cheers
Zarrar
The minVal thing just specifies a threshold for the smallest positive value in the image. I don't think it should be cause for any difference between FSL and AFNI based scripts. The current FSL (film_gls) command used employs a -noest option wherein autocorrelations are not estimated so you might want to use the -Oerrts output option instead of -Rerrts. I don't know enough to explain why this was done with the FSL command. Also not sure about setting -polort 0.
Cheers
Zarrar
Threaded View
| Title | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Lisa Eyler | Jun 8, 2010 | |
| cirong liu | Nov 1, 2011 | |
| Maarten Mennes | Nov 1, 2011 | |
| Xi-Nian Zuo | Jun 14, 2010 | |
| Maarten Mennes | Jun 14, 2010 | |
| Lisa Eyler | Jun 14, 2010 | |
| veena nair | Aug 4, 2012 | |
| veena nair | Aug 8, 2012 | |
| Maarten Mennes | Aug 8, 2012 | |
| veena nair | Aug 8, 2012 | |
| Zarrar Shehzad | Aug 9, 2011 | |
| Clare Kelly | Jun 16, 2010 | |