help
help > RE: Question reg second level results
Oct 17, 2011 08:10 PM | Alfonso Nieto-Castanon - Boston University
RE: Question reg second level results
Hi Johnson,
Yes, that is a good point. Your analyses are perfectly correct and they should give you exactly the same results as any of the two alternative approaches within the conn toolbox.
Best
Alfonso
Originally posted by Johnson H:
Yes, that is a good point. Your analyses are perfectly correct and they should give you exactly the same results as any of the two alternative approaches within the conn toolbox.
Best
Alfonso
Originally posted by Johnson H:
Hi Alfonso
Thanks a lot for the detailed and quick response. And the script will be a great help too you saved me a lot of time.
In the mean time I did something and just want to make sure if its right...
From the FC second level results I got the individual subjects conn images and loaded them in SPM paired sample t-test comparing pre>post(1 -1) and pre>post (-1 1). Is this right?
Will it give the same resuts as what you suggested?
Thanks again for your help!!!!
Johnson
Thanks a lot for the detailed and quick response. And the script will be a great help too you saved me a lot of time.
In the mean time I did something and just want to make sure if its right...
From the FC second level results I got the individual subjects conn images and loaded them in SPM paired sample t-test comparing pre>post(1 -1) and pre>post (-1 1). Is this right?
Will it give the same resuts as what you suggested?
Thanks again for your help!!!!
Johnson
Threaded View
| Title | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Johnson H | Oct 17, 2011 | |
| Jake Flinthoff | Aug 15, 2018 | |
| Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Oct 17, 2011 | |
| Johnson H | Oct 17, 2011 | |
| Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Oct 17, 2011 | |
| Johnson H | Oct 17, 2011 | |
| Macià Buades-Rotger | Dec 9, 2015 | |
| Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Dec 11, 2015 | |