help > RE: order for nuisance regression and filtering
Jul 3, 2013  05:07 AM | Alfonso Nieto-Castanon - Boston University
RE: order for nuisance regression and filtering
Dear Dr. Jung,

Thank you for your positive feedback about the toolbox. Regarding the removal of confounding effects in the conn toolbox, if you keep the default settings the toolbox will perform (in this order) despiking, nuisance regression/removal (including motion and CompCor components, as well as a linear detrending term), and band-pass filtering. You may remove any of these steps by changing the selected options in the conn toolbox 'Preprocessing' tab, but you can not change their ordering. Detrending (when selected) is always implemented as part of nuisance regression/removal step by adding a linear term as an additional regressor to the general linear model. If in addition you select the 'Simult' option, then all of the regressors in this general linear model will be filtered (using the same band-pass filter as that apply to the data) before performing the regression step, which effectively implements a simultaneous filtering-regression operation (it is a different implementation but it leads to exactly the same results as if one were to add a set of low-frequency and high-frequency regressors into the general linear model, and then performing a single regression step to simultaneously remove the nuisance factors and perform band-pass filtering). I added a small discussion about the difference between the 'Simult' and the default 'RegBP' procedures in this news post if you are interested (http://www.nitrc.org/forum/forum.php?for...), and you can read about these issues in more detail in this recent manuscript (Hallquist, M.N., Hwang, K., Luna, B., 2013. The nuisance of nuisance regression: Spectral misspecification in a common approach to resting-state fMRI preprocessing reintroduces noise and obscures functional connectivity. NeuroImage, 82:208-225)

Regarding the potential application of despiking before the spatial preprocessing steps, I do not know of any studies looking at the potential differences here, but my impression is that as long as you do not perform slice timing correction (and the standard recommendation for rsfMRI is that this step is typically not necessary since the frequencies of interest in rsfMRI are often considerably lower than the timing differences introduced by the slice acquisition order) the two procedures (despiking before or after spatial preprocessing) should lead to very similar results for most standard sources of BOLD signal artifacts (those that typically benefit from despiking as a way to minimize their effect on the functional connectivity measures). Another related procedure that you may be interested in is 'scrubbing', which attempts to identify potential outlier scans and remove them from the analyses before computing functional connectivity measures. In the conn toolbox this is not yet part of the default behavior but you can still easily implement this using ART (http://www.nitrc.org/projects/artifact_d...) as an additional preprocessing step and then including the ART-generated SPM-regressors as additional first-level covariates (and confounding effects) into the conn toolbox in order to remove the identified scans from the analyses. 

Hope this helps
Alfonso




Originally posted by Wi Hoon Jung:
Dear Dr. Nieto-Castanon,
 
Thank you for the CONN toolbox. I'm performing resting-state functional connectivity projects. I've downloaded the latest version of the CONN (v.13n) and found new options including 'RegBP or Simult', detrending, and despiking. Everything in the latest updates to the CONN is excellent. You recommend a procedure referred as 'Simult' (simultaneous regression and band-pass). How about detrending and despiking?
 
Q1) Some researchers have performed only one nuisance signal regression procedure including motion parameters, CompCorr signals, and linear trend for each subject's rs-fMRI data. How about the CONN toolbox? Is the CONN (v.13n) performed nuisance regression procedure including motion parameters and CompCorr singals (or with band-pass filtering as 'Simult' option) and linear detrending separately or all together? 
 
Q2) Could you tell me the order in which the following procedures are processed in the CONN toolbox ?
- (i) nuisance regression, (ii) band-pass filtering, (iii) detredning, and (iv) despiking. 
 
Q3) As I known, researchers conducted despiking before slice timing correction. Is there any problem to perform despiking on preprocessed data (i.e., slice timing, realigned, normalized, and smoothed data)?
 
Thank you
 
 
 
 

Threaded View

TitleAuthorDate
Wi Hoon Jung Jul 3, 2013
RE: order for nuisance regression and filtering
Alfonso Nieto-Castanon Jul 3, 2013
Wi Hoon Jung Jul 3, 2013