help
help > RE: ROI problem (csf)
Jun 14, 2016 03:06 PM | Alfonso Nieto-Castanon - Boston University
RE: ROI problem (csf)
Hi Bob,
If you are using the latest release (currently 16a) then the same 'e'-prepended file should be created in either case (when defining a erosion flag or when using only thresholding) containing the corresponding eroded and/or thresholded ROIs. Please let me know otherwise
Best
Alfonso
Originally posted by Bob Kraft:
If you are using the latest release (currently 16a) then the same 'e'-prepended file should be created in either case (when defining a erosion flag or when using only thresholding) containing the corresponding eroded and/or thresholded ROIs. Please let me know otherwise
Best
Alfonso
Originally posted by Bob Kraft:
I would like to verify the WM and CSF ROIs
created when using the batch.Setup.cwthreshold. When the
erosion flags are set an "e" is appended to the masks. This allows
me to easily check the masks created after erosion. However,
I am unable to find a similar file when just the threshold is
set.
How can I check the masks created if the erosion step is skipped?
How can I check the masks created if the erosion step is skipped?
Threaded View
| Title | Author | Date |
|---|---|---|
| sherihane Bensemmane | Nov 30, 2015 | |
| Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Nov 30, 2015 | |
| sherihane Bensemmane | Dec 1, 2015 | |
| Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Dec 1, 2015 | |
| sherihane Bensemmane | Dec 2, 2015 | |
| sherihane Bensemmane | Dec 2, 2015 | |
| Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Dec 2, 2015 | |
| Jalmar Teeuw | Dec 2, 2015 | |
| Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Dec 3, 2015 | |
| Jalmar Teeuw | Feb 8, 2016 | |
| Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Feb 13, 2016 | |
| Jalmar Teeuw | Feb 15, 2016 | |
| Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Feb 17, 2016 | |
| Bob Kraft | Jun 14, 2016 | |
| Alfonso Nieto-Castanon | Jun 14, 2016 | |
| Bob Kraft | Jun 22, 2016 | |
| Jalmar Teeuw | Dec 4, 2015 | |
| sherihane Bensemmane | Dec 3, 2015 | |