nifti2_data_format > RE: NIFTI-2 proposal
Mar 1, 2011  05:03 AM | Andrew Janke
RE: NIFTI-2 proposal
Hi Mark,

I can't see this being a problem, but would echo what others said about killing the .hdr/.img duple support. I'm also one for keeping the changes simple at this point (not changing other parts of the header while you are at it), the reason being is that the NifTi header is always going to be restrictive in what you can put in there. Extra bits should be added as NifTi comments or as you mention done as part of a NifTi successor.

At least if niftilib is going to support this without any hassle to me that's more than a good reason for us here in MINC-land to use it instead of our own home-grown nifti reading/writing libraries. So thumbs up from MINC.

Still I am curious, just how much RAM do you lot have to have exhausted 32767*32767*x?


a

Threaded View

TitleAuthorDate
Mark Jenkinson Feb 28, 2011
Mark Jenkinson Mar 15, 2011
Cinly Ooi Mar 15, 2011
Cinly Ooi Mar 2, 2011
Ged Ridgway Mar 7, 2011
Jon Clayden Mar 5, 2011
Cinly Ooi Mar 1, 2011
Andrew Janke Mar 1, 2011
Cinly Ooi Mar 2, 2011
Satrajit Ghosh Mar 5, 2011
Cinly Ooi Mar 1, 2011
Cinly Ooi Mar 1, 2011
Cinly Ooi Mar 1, 2011
Cinly Ooi Mar 1, 2011
Denis Rivière Feb 28, 2011
Cinly Ooi Mar 1, 2011
Brandon Whitcher Mar 1, 2011
Satrajit Ghosh Feb 28, 2011
Jonas Larsson Mar 1, 2011
Mark Horsfield Mar 1, 2011
RE: NIFTI-2 proposal
Andrew Janke Mar 1, 2011
Jochen Weber Feb 28, 2011
Randall Frank Mar 1, 2011
Michael Martinez Feb 28, 2011
Cinly Ooi Feb 28, 2011
Chris Rorden Feb 28, 2011