nifti2_data_format > RE: NIFTI-2 proposal
Mar 5, 2011  01:03 PM | Jon Clayden - University College London
RE: NIFTI-2 proposal
I agree with Andrew that data ordering/slicing (LAS/RAS etc.) should be a visualisation question and not a storage one. It would certainly simplify things, and no doubt save many people some grief, if there were one standard storage convention.

I am happy with the proposal, and willing to add support for NIfTI-2 in TractoR; but if Analyze backwards compatibility is to be broken, it does seem like an opportunity to consider some wider changes to the format.

All the best,
Jon

Threaded View

TitleAuthorDate
Mark Jenkinson Feb 28, 2011
Mark Jenkinson Mar 15, 2011
Cinly Ooi Mar 15, 2011
Cinly Ooi Mar 2, 2011
Ged Ridgway Mar 7, 2011
RE: NIFTI-2 proposal
Jon Clayden Mar 5, 2011
Cinly Ooi Mar 1, 2011
Andrew Janke Mar 1, 2011
Cinly Ooi Mar 2, 2011
Satrajit Ghosh Mar 5, 2011
Cinly Ooi Mar 1, 2011
Cinly Ooi Mar 1, 2011
Cinly Ooi Mar 1, 2011
Cinly Ooi Mar 1, 2011
Denis Rivière Feb 28, 2011
Cinly Ooi Mar 1, 2011
Brandon Whitcher Mar 1, 2011
Satrajit Ghosh Feb 28, 2011
Jonas Larsson Mar 1, 2011
Mark Horsfield Mar 1, 2011
Andrew Janke Mar 1, 2011
Jochen Weber Feb 28, 2011
Randall Frank Mar 1, 2011
Michael Martinez Feb 28, 2011
Cinly Ooi Feb 28, 2011
Chris Rorden Feb 28, 2011