help > RE: Single subject pre/post treatment analysis
Jul 1, 2015  05:07 PM | Alfonso Nieto-Castanon - Boston University
RE: Single subject pre/post treatment analysis
Hi Kaitlin,

Yes, you are exactly right, you could define three subject "groups" (one for your single patient "pre" scan, another for your single patient "post" scan, and another for your multiple-subject "control" group), and then use a [1 0 -1] contrast to evaluate the differences between your patient "pre" scan and your control group, a [0 1 -1] contrast to evaluate the differences between your patient "post" scan and your control group, and a [-1 1 0] to evaluate the "post vs. pre" differences in connectivity against the between-subjects variance in your control group. All of these will be valid analyses, yet note that the latter will be a somewhat conservative test for those post vs. pre differences. A more standard and powerful test would evaluate the post-pre differences in your patient against comparable post-pre differences in your control group (that would typically have more power simply because the within subject post-pre difference contrast is expected to have considerably less between-subjects variance than each of the individual post or pre effects) but for that you would need to have repeated measures of your control group as well (in a setting that is comparable to the "pre" and "post" conditions in your patient).

In any way, to set this up you simply need to define in Setup.Basic the number of subjects as N+2 (where N is the number of controls), the number of sessions per subject as 1, then enter in Setup.Functionals the "pre" and "post" scans of your patient as if they were individual scans from different subjects, define a single "rest" condition in Setup.Conditions, and last, define your three second-level covariates in Setup.CovariatesSecondLevel as: "PatientPre" (e.g. [1 0  zeros(1,N)]), "PatientPost" (e.g. [0 1 zeros(1,N)]), and "Controls" (e.g. [0 0 ones(1,N)]). 

Last, and just for completion, if you do have repeated ("pre" and "post") measures for your control group, then you would instead define in Setup.Basic the number of subjects as N+1 (where N is the number of controls), the number of sessions per subject as 2, then enter in Setup.Functionals the "pre" and "post" scans for all your controls and patient as separate sessions, define two conditions "pre" and "post" in Setup.Conditions associating each condition with an individual sessionand last, define two second-level covariates in Setup.CovariatesSecondLevel as: "Patient" (e.g. [1 zeros(1,N)]), and "Controls" (e.g. [0 ones(1,N)]). 


Hope this helps
Alfonso

Originally posted by Kaitlin Cassady:
Hi Alfonso,

Thank you for the very helpful response! Is it also possible to set up the second-level analysis with three "groups": the "pre" time point, "post" time point, and time points from healthy controls (while modeling the control group as zero)? With this setup, I believe the necessary variance would be obtained in order to perform the connectivity analysis with only one subject - is that correct? If so, how would I set this up?

Thanks!
Kaitlin

Threaded View

TitleAuthorDate
Helen Carlson Jun 5, 2014
Alfonso Nieto-Castanon Jun 7, 2014
Batiah Keissar Nov 19, 2022
Kaitlin Cassady Jun 26, 2015
Alfonso Nieto-Castanon Jun 29, 2015
Nabila BRIHMAT Nov 21, 2020
Nabila BRIHMAT Nov 30, 2020
Johann Philipp Zöllner Jan 24, 2016
Alfonso Nieto-Castanon Jan 25, 2016
Kaitlin Cassady Jun 30, 2015
RE: Single subject pre/post treatment analysis
Alfonso Nieto-Castanon Jul 1, 2015
Kaitlin Cassady Jul 2, 2015
Alfonso Nieto-Castanon Jul 4, 2015
Kaitlin Cassady Jul 6, 2015